When Howard Dean began campaigning, the media commented
with amazement on the tens of thousands of Americans who immediately began
sending him donations. It appeared that he had thousands of supporters all
across the nation. Rather quickly, his contributions totaled over $30,000!
(Eventually, over $45,000!) This was seen as astounding, in view of the
fact that his rival contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination
were financially limping along. There was good reason for that paucity of
support: Polls indicated all of the nearly one dozen candidates ranked
alike; and individuals and corporations were waiting to give their money
to the one who would do best in the first few state elections. None of
this had yet taken place.
In addition, Dean suddenly had a "national
organization" of dedicated people trying to get him elected. No other
candidate had this. How such a grassroots, full-blown organization could
suddenly develop was indeed mysterious.
To add to the mystery, individuals all over America
suddenly began opening new websites, on which they were campaigning for
him and requesting donations! All the while Dean was preoccupied back
East, busily speaking in Iowa and New Hampshire. This whole thing was too
organized to be the result of grassroots individualism. The labor unions,
abortionists, or gambling interests were not behind this; for they still
did not yet know which of the nine candidates to throw their support to.
Viewing this sudden crescendo of support, people began
thinking, "Well, if so many others in the country believe he is the
man of the hour—then I guess I should think so too!" Within a short
time, he shot to the top of the national polls.
However, Dean’s obvious self-centeredness,
intolerance, caustic attacks, rages, and extreme liberalism ultimately
cost him the initial crucial elections.
From the very beginning, I strongly suspected that,
before he came to the public’s attention, Dean had made a secret compact
with the gays. He had been the governor who, in Vermont, signed into law
that first liberal law about homosexual unions, which led to the enactment
of more elsewhere.
Gay organizations are excellent at providing financial,
logistic, and organizational support to pro-gay candidates (including
Willy Brown in San Francisco and Gray Davis in Sacramento).
Today, February 18, I listened to Dean’s
announcement, made in Burlington, Vermont, that he was pulling out of the
presidential race. During that speech, he mentioned that nearly a third of
his financial contributors were "under 30." That is revealing.
In that speech, he spoke with utter confidence, that he was in charge of a
nationwide organization of multiplied thousands of totally loyal
supporters. How could he dare say that—on the day that he was dropping
out of the presidential race? Amid frequent hooting and screams from the
audience, he declared in the strongest tones that, because of his new
organization, "we will no longer be divided by sexual
orientation." "We will change the face of democracy in
America." "We will take back the country for ordinary
people." "We expect the next president to obey our
standards." "We will get equal rights for every single
citizen."
The media seemed puzzled as to the meaning. Dean is
clearly setting himself up as the one man leading out in a nationwide
organization—which is going to dictate what the Democratic Party is to
enact on executive and legislative levels. And you can know that his
demands will be as extreme as possible, far surpassing the milder
objectives of average Democratic politicians who are careful to placate a
wide range of voters. They have to get re-elected; Dean is bound by no
such limitations.
I predict that you have not seen the last of Howard
Dean. He will try to become the national spokesman for every type of
pro-homosexual, feminist, abortionist, etc., group in the land.
If you will stop to think about it, although the
homosexuals have made great strides in legislation, courts, and schools
and already have a number of separate gay and lesbian coalitions—yet, so
far, they have lacked a single coherent national base with which to place
intense pressure on the Democratic Party, to enact anything they order it
to do. (Recognizing that at least 50% of Republicans are Protestant or
Catholic, the gays know they will have to rely on Democratic
functionaries, on all levels, to accomplish their purposes for America.)
Why do I mention this? First, it is a national
development. God’s faithful ones should be aware of what is taking
place. Second, what Dean is trying to do could help crystallize the
determination of a combined Protestant-Catholic coalition to "save
America’s morality" by, among other things, enacting a strict
National Sunday Law.
And that would throw us into the end. (See my End-Time
Series, which contains the most complete, classified collection of
Spirit of Prophecy statements on last-day events.)
I am not saying that Dean will be the one to thrust us into final
events. But I am saying that we should be observant as to what is taking
place. To the degree that we are able, we should keep distributing
low-cost missionary books to everyone around us. We should pray and do
what we can to forward God’s cause at this time in history. The end is
nearing. —vf